I’ve just read about a very interesting development in the field of social networking: OpenBC is going to change its name to Xing. To quote Michael Specht, this is big. (He was talking about ebay pulling out about of China, but the reason is the same: China is changing everything).
I think this is a smart move of OpenBC. To put it into context, I’m a member of both OpenBC and of LinkedIn. I have paid membership of OpenBC, but not of LinkedIn. My experience is that OpenBC is much more flexible, and allows me to do more in terms of personal brand development and in-the-flesh networking, and its fee structure is affordable. On the other hand, its greater openess means I need to be rather more careful in selecting contacts, and agreeing to contact requests. LinkedIn’s greater stringency means it’s more difficult to connect with people that you don’t know, but it’s also less useful to me in practical terms – at least, with the free membership, but I find its fees to be a bit too high.
The other issue is the membership and future direction. Here in Singapore, I find that LinkedIn has lots of professional members, but not many people really use it, except for a few dedicated networkers – most of whom are on OpenBC as well. OpenBC has a broader, more diverse membership, but is more active in promoting offline events. In China, during my year there, I saw that LinkedIn is an irrelevance, whereas OpenBC was going ballistic, with lots of people joining, and lots of Chinese joining.
The secret is that OpenBC allows people to use their own language. Here are the system language options (ie, the languages users can use to operate their accounts):
- English
- German
- Spanish
- Italian
- Dutch
- Finnish
- Russian
- Hungarian
- Japanese
- French
- Portugese
- Swedish
- Chinese
- Korean
- Turkish
- Polish
Here are the languages you can use for LinkedIn:
- English
See? Of course, this means that if you only speak English, either network is OK. If you speak more than one language, OpenBC will give you a broader network. If you work in China, OpenBC is the only game in town.
I think this trend, to dominance in East Asia, must of course be even clearer to the OpenBC folks, hence the name change. As they say themselves, In China, for example, XING translates as ‘can do’ and ‘encounters’. Stowe Boyd, who has something to do with OpenBC but isn’t part of the management, has been trying to work out what the new name means. It’s xíng, second tone, meaning “You’re on”, “OK”, and is part of everyday speech, as in”xing ma? Xing!” – “Is that OK? It’s OK!”
Smart move by OpenBC, I say. By the way, I wonder why they aren’t offering Hindi or Tamil – especially as (IIRC) the Tamil community is extremely active online. I know they have people in India, so perhaps these options are coming….
I got the email and figured you would do something sooner about this. I still get invited to networking events in Beijing through OpenBC…
Neither system works well unless you and your network are active. It can be hard to convince people to join which is why I never invited anyone to join OpenBC and gave up inviting people to LinkedIn too. Well that was one of the reasons.
The language isssue important, but there is a pure Chinese networking site called Tianjin which someone from Tsinghua invited me to join. It doesn’t seem to get much press. LinkedIn is from the Valley so all the Silicon Valley bloggers and pundits toute it. OpenBC started elsewhere, it suffers from Not Invented Here Syndrome to a degree.
There are too many of these sites.
Did you see the info I dug up on Innovation in China? I told Max about it, he is taking a wait and see approach about how truely innovative the Chinese will become.
LinkedIn remembers the emails of people I invited as literally years later when someone else convinces them of the merrits of joining people have accepted my invites. People who I’m a bit further out of touch with perhaps, but still potentially valuable contacts.
Oops, just noticed a missing word:
“In China, during my year there, I saw that LinkedIn is an irrelevance, whereas OpenBC was going ballistic, with lots of people joining, and SPECIFICALLY lots of Chinese joining.”
[...] I wrote about this not so long ago, so it was interesting to find an article via memeorandum by Carsten Cumbrowski: “Europes Xing.com – The LinkedIn.com Killer?!“. It’s a good article, but he completely misses the Asian aspect that is actually the most important feature of what’s going on in the competition between the two networks. I tried to leave a comment, but only get a blank page, so here’s what I wrote: Carsten, great article and I agree with your analysis. [...]
[...] I was introduced to OpenBC early on in my MBA here, and to LinkedIn just after I went on exchange to Beijing. Based on my experience with both, I observed that neither is really influential here in Singapore, but that OpenBC was far and away more popular in China. Once OpenBC changed their name to Xing, it was clear to me that they were going to be the winners, and I came out and said so, here. [...]
check this its also very impotent development in social network in china 360Quan.com is reported by the press in China as a ‘local phenomenon’. Reported by Baidu, ChinaLabs, and several other tech reports as the ’spark of online China’, and the ‘future company in China’. 360Quan.com is a leading Internet property.