Pirates

29 07 2007

Most boys grow up wanting to be a pirate at some stage, and that’s certainly going to be true now, after Johnny Depp et al have reinforced the stereotype for a new generation.

On another level, the classic pirates of the seventeenth and eighteenth century have been re-assessed by the likes of Hakim Bey (Pirate Utopias) and Peter Linebaugh & Marcus Rediker (The Many-Headed Hydra: The Hidden History of the Revolutionary Atlantic). In these historical narratives, the pirate ship is a democracy of social revolutionaries, rejecting the cruelty and authority of empire.

The inescapable fact is that piracy involves violence and suffering inflicted against the innocent; it may also be true that the pirates are themselves the victims of, and rebels against, a system that utilizes far greater violence in order to preserve itself – or it may not. It’s much easier to be romantic about pirates who died two hundred years ago, that’s for sure.

Nevertheless, pirates are alive and well today – and are a big problem in this part of the world. Some will be social rejects defying the forces of economic globalization, some will be criminals out for loot, others yet will be terrorists seeking funds. Probably, there’s a lot of overlap, and of movement between categories. This is the sort of territory explored by John Robb in Global Guerillas. It would be fascinating to hear the stories of these modern-day pirates in their own words: their own narrative of how they came to be who they are, of the societies that sustain them, and the economies they build around their activities.

That’s not likely to happen, I guess, so we only hear one side of the story – but that’s interesting enough, when you hear the details of what’s happening away from the headlines, on the fringes of the shipping lanes that tie our global economy together. Via a post on Boing Boing, I found an article – The Pirate Hunters – from the Smithsonian Magazine, which makes fascinating reading.





Getting back in the saddle

29 07 2007

Last Thursday night I attended a seminar organized by the Information and Knowledge Management Society. It’s over a year since I went to one of their events, and I have to say it was a breath of fresh air! The seminar’s topic was Social Network Analysis, and was presented by Graham Durant-Law, a senior Knowledge Management practitioner who was visiting from Australia.

SNA is one of the topics that has fascinated me since I studied KM as part of my MBA; it’s a field that I’ve been involved in without realizing it for many years. The way things have developed for me over the past year mean that I haven’t really had the chance to do much work in the field, which has been a matter of some regret. Having attended this seminar, I feel really inspired to get back in the saddle and do something about that!

Graham’s presentation was followed by work in groups; I took the opportunity to discuss a personal project I’ve been thinking about that would depend heavily on SNA, and I got excellent feedback and suggestions from the other participants. Graham also made some suggestions that really sorted out some problems I’d envisaged with the implementation.

After this, I’m really looking forward to the next seminar, which will deal with taxonomy in Knowledge Management!





Green GDP grounded?

29 07 2007

The UK’s Daily Telegraph wasn’t my favourite newspaper while I was still living in Britain; it doesn’t exactly fit my political sympathies.

Having said that, I read it faithfully for a few years, for the simple reason that it was the first to see the potential of the Web and to go online. I don’t read it even there any more, but I am being won over by their China correspondent, Richard Spencer, whose blog is here.

He’s written this piece, which refers this article; it seems that the attempt by China’s leadership to protect the environment through publication of a green GDP is failing, due to opposition at the provincial and county level.

I first heard about this policy while I was doing my MBA, and was naturally enthusiastic: it seemed to be a very progressive viewpoint. That it’s not working out isn’t a huge surprise, I guess; in the same way that the leadership is having difficulty in stamping out corruption, it’s almost inevitable that they wouldn’t find it easy to implement a policy that damages profits by forcing business and officials to account for externalities such as pollution and health issues.

I hope that this isn’t the end of it – and in fact, I don’t think it can be. The stakes are just too high – and, although I don’t know how this is going to work out – the Chinese people now control too many means of communication, through mobile phones and the internet. Although the government is filtering and monitoring these, the genie is easing its way out of the bottle.

I’m not talking here about the Communist Party’s monopoly on power, let’s be clear. I don’t want to get into that argument. I do actually think that Hu Jintao and Wen Jiaobao are serious about the ‘harmonious society’ vision, and do wish to see the environment protected, and social equity grow. They must know that if they don’t do this, the consequences of desertification, pollution, and corruption could be catastrophic.

If this is right, then the aims of the highest and lowest in China are in accord. There’s an ancient Chinese saying that “the mountains are high, and the emperor is far away”, indicating the difficulty that the ordinary Chinese has had in communicating grievances to higher authority about the abuse of power by local officialdom. I hope that communications technology will give an opportunity to lower the mountain, and bring the ‘emperor’ closer – to weed out corruption, and help protect the environment in China.





Social network #3

21 07 2007

Social networking tools… I got introduced to OpenBC during my time at Nanyang Business School, and to LinkedIn at Tsinghua. I’ve written a a fair bit about them both, especially after OpenBC became Xing, and started really focusing on China. Since then, LinkedIn has come back strongly, with a lot of new tools…

… but all along, I’ve been wondering: where are all my old, pre-Asia, contacts? How come there seemed to be so few Welsh on either LinkedIn or Xing?

Now I’ve joined a new networking tool, and found the answer – they  were all on Facebook!





Manufacturing in China

21 07 2007

Boing Boing has posted an amazing article, if you’re interested in what it’s like at the high-end of Chinese manufacturing.

It’s a series of links to blog posts, with supporting videos,  by someone called Bunnie Huang: he’s a US-based entrepreneur, visiting China to look for contractors to manufacture a computer peripheral he’s invented.  Very, very interesting indeed.





Cyborg technology

21 07 2007

I’ve been saying for a long time that the boomer generation, once it realised its mortality, was going to throw its enormous financial resources at medical technology – and would be the guinea pigs for the outcome. With any luck by the time my generation gets old, the technology to rebuild us and – who knows – maybe even rejuvenate us will be stable, tested and cheap :-)

Latest news flashes on the road to this cyborg future:

  • An artificial hand invented by a Scottish NHS worker reaches market. It’s integrated with the patient’s muscles, and controlled by the mind, just like a real hand. There’s a photo gallery of people with these artificial hands here.
  • Speaking of muscles, New Scientist reports that nanotubes hold a lot of promise for untiring prosthetic muscles.




It’s a glitch in the system: it happens when they change something

20 07 2007

I’ve been corresponding with a contact in China recently; over the last few days, I’ve been surprised to get ‘message not deliverable’ messages bouncing back to my inbox – since I knew that my emails had arrived, and been replied to! At first, I just put it down to the general weirdness that sometimes crops up with emails in China.

However, it may be something more sinister… It seems that this week, the Chinese censors have been tinkering with the Great Firewall… and making a bit of a mess of it, to great annoyance of the business sector.

It would be easy to take this opportunity to take a cheap shot at China’s internet censorship – but the fact is, email is never private, anywhere in the world, unless you take great care and use a lot of heavy-duty encryption. But who does?